<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>David&#039;s technobabble &#187; twiki</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bable.cybermarshall.com/tag/twiki/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bable.cybermarshall.com</link>
	<description>David&#039;s thoughts about this and that</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:29:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What I hope gets &#8220;fixed&#8221; in SharePoint 2010</title>
		<link>http://bable.cybermarshall.com/2009/06/13/what-i-hope-gets-fixed-in-sharepoint-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://bable.cybermarshall.com/2009/06/13/what-i-hope-gets-fixed-in-sharepoint-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 19:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SharePoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fckeditor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foswiki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tinymce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twiki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wiki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bable.cybermarshall.com/?p=638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are some limitations in WSS 3.0/SharePoint 2007 that are hurting the adoption of SharePoint 2007 at my company. I&#8217;m sure that this is pretty common. Many users are familiar with WordPress and Foswiki/TWiki. My users are looking for easy to use editors, plug-ins, and themes that they can use on their team sites and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some limitations in WSS 3.0/SharePoint 2007 that are hurting the adoption of SharePoint 2007 at my company. I&#8217;m sure that this is pretty common. Many users are familiar with WordPress and Foswiki/TWiki. My users are looking for easy to use editors, plug-ins, and themes that they can use on their team sites and &#8220;my sites&#8221;.  With the &#8220;Revolution&#8221; in Social media and Web 2.0  users are familiar with open source web tools that allow rich-text editing and replaceable editors. They complain bitterly about editing their content, blog or a wiki inside SharePoint. <span id="more-638"></span></p>
<ul>
<li>The WSS 3.0/SharePoint 2007 WYSIWYG editor can’t upload images, video, audio clips and can&#8217;t insert Flash files.<br/>The workaround requires so many mouse clicks and web page interactions, that users look at me like I have &#8220;3 heads&#8221; when I show it to them.</li>
<li>Working with tables is difficult, at best</li>
<li>Any customizations such as:
<ul>
<li>custom file browsers,</li>
<li>link management,</li>
<li>syntax aware code viewers,</li>
<li>and much more</li>
</ul>
<p>are difficult to implement</li>
</ul>
<p>From a Wiki perspective </p>
<ul>
<li>Explicit syntax [[]]</li>
<li>No free form image inserts</li>
<li>No server side include of other topics.<br/>Need an easy way to include content from another site. In Foswiki/Twki the %{link} tag can be used</li>
<li>No easy upload and insert of attachments</li>
<li>No Easy way to insert links.<br/>Foswiki/TWiki support WikiWord/Camel Case.
<li>No tagging</li>
<li>WYSIWYG support for tables is ugly. You must know the number of rows and columns in advance.<br/>Foswiki/TWiki support simple &#8220;|&#8221; character based table definitions and an editable table plugin</li>
<li>No printable vew</li>
<li>No export to PDF/Word</li>
<li>Limited Alerts support.<br/>Email alerts say something changed and include the full text. However, this can not be customized to tell you what changed. You must login and see the history for that.<br/>Foswiki/Twiki support a highly customizable WebNotify</li>
<li>No easy support for multiple top level webs.<br/>There is only one flat &#8220;Wiki Pages&#8221; page with list view, no hierarchical view or some sort of sitemap feature.Wikis are made up of Topics that are interlinked in the form of a graph. Hence a specific Tree or Hierarchy structure is not the right representation. However, there must be a way to find all top level topics, i.e. Topics that are not linked to by any other topics. These topics will include
<ul>
<li>the starting points</li>
<li>new topics that have been added but not yet organized.</li>
</ul>
<p>I could not find a way to do this with this with the SharePoint Wiki. Even a simple way to flag a page as &#8220;add this page&#8221; to &#8220;Quick Launch&#8221; would help.</li>
<li>Not easy to provide a standard footer<br/>No apparent concept of templates</li>
</ul>
<p>The &#8220;MS/SharePoint 2007&#8243; update approach does not seem to fit into this &#8220;revolution&#8221;, either. The current approach requires direct access to the servers to install and activate extensions. With &#8220;Cloud Computing&#8221; and web hosting on the rise; the direct server access approach is not a good match. SharePoint needs something like a <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/plugin-central/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/wordpress.org/extend/plugins/plugin-central/?referer=');">Plug-in central</a> for SharePoint. Ideally, this could work on a site level and not require Central Administration be updated first. Another issue for remote management is that &#8220;by default&#8221; SharePoint Central Administration and SharePoint Sites must run on different tcp/ip ports. I&#8217;m sure that if I work real hard I can find a way to run them on the same port using &#8220;host-headers&#8221;. However, if I do, then will this really be supported or would the next next patch or upgrade break my sites?</p>
<p>So my wish list for SharePoint 2010 starts with:</p>
<ul>
<li>A site focused web based upload, install, and management capability similar to that found in <a href="http://wordpress.org/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/wordpress.org/?referer=');">WordPress</a> and <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/plugin-central/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/wordpress.org/extend/plugins/plugin-central/?referer=');">Plug-in central for WordPress</a></li>
<li>A Rich-Text Editor that is rich in function, easily expandable and replaceable.<br />
Consider integrating a freely available javascript-based Rich-Text Editor for all browsers including IE. My primary choices would be <a href="http://www.fckeditor.net/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.fckeditor.net/?referer=');">FCKEditor</a> and <a href="http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/tinymce.moxiecode.com/?referer=');">TinyMCE or TinyMCE Advanved</a>.</li>
<li>A competitive wiki and blog, without having to buying 3rd party add-ons.</li>
</ul>
<p>Perhaps Microsoft only wants SharePoint to be a document sharing facility. Maybe I should not be trying to bend WSS and SharePoint into the social media and web 2.0 &#8220;arena&#8221;. Maybe that &#8220;arena&#8221; should just belong to Apache, Linux and Open Source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bable.cybermarshall.com/2009/06/13/what-i-hope-gets-fixed-in-sharepoint-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
